What are the six parts of a scientific argument?

The six parts of a scientific argument are crucial for structuring research in a logical and systematic way. Identifying a problem is the first step that sets the foundation for the inquiry, as it lays out the issue that needs investigation. Asking a question follows this, as it helps to focus the research and guide the hypothesis development. The hypothesis is a proposed explanation that can be tested, leading to the next step of data collection. This involves gathering evidence through experiments or observations that address the question posed.

Analysis comes after data collection, where the gathered data is examined to determine if it supports or refutes the hypothesis. Finally, reaching a conclusion synthesizes the results of the analysis, allowing scientists to understand the implications of their findings concerning the initial problem and question. This structured approach is essential for advancing knowledge in the scientific community.

Other choices do not present a comprehensive or logical sequence of the scientific argument's key elements, making them less accurate representations of the scientific process.